It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
AS882010M0: [...] SAFEST OS [...] all patching has been COMPLETED.
That's the dumbest thing I've read in a long time. There's no such thing as completed security. All that means is it was uptodate with patched known security flaws till the date of the latest patch. Security is an endless cat and mouse chase. Any new security flaws, vulnerabilities coming out after they drop support will *not* be patched. It is only a matter of time till old OS's are an open book to any script kiddie out there.
Post edited May 01, 2023 by Pheace
I never seen a millionaire script kiddie, have you ? Double Dumbass.
avatar
neumi5694: You got no idea how much information can be collected about you while typing this text in the browser.
Oh I do. That's why I don't use Chrome and its URL bar keylogger. Let me guess a web browser made by an advertising agency vs a Firefox that's had all its telemetry removed are "both the same for telemetry" (rolls eyes)...
Going through the entire Firefox about: list is not my idea of a fun weekend for the next 10yrs. just so I can say I removed all telemetry. Is there a more automated way ?
avatar
BrianSim: Oh I do. That's why I don't use Chrome and its URL bar keylogger. Let me guess a web browser made by an advertising agency vs a Firefox that's had all its telemetry removed are "both the same for telemetry" (rolls eyes)...
No, I actually mean the metadata, not just logs of your input. I mean how long you visited what part of a webpage, that stuff. Our website admin showed me all the info he can extract from someone visiting our site, it 's .... remarkable.
Once you have seen that, you can just smile at the "windows spyware".
Post edited May 01, 2023 by neumi5694
avatar
Pheace: Is it me or am I lacking a distinct security concern here?
Lack of security patches is both a valid concern but also gets way overblown often into the realms of hysterical paranoia (reaction to Spectre / Meltdown was absurd in the big picture of things. "Quick, quick we need to cripple performance and disable hyper-threading in gaming rigs and, and...").

The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th most important PC security thing the end user can do are:-

- Not give out personal information to that nice man on the phone.
- Not reuse passwords across sites
- Enable 2FA
- Switch to a whitelist firewall (that stops anything phoning home)
- Change the default password on their router (this is what hackers will see long before they even attempt to hack a PC sitting behind it. Changing the password stops them changing the router's default DNS server to a compromised one that redirects to a cloned banking site with web address and security certificate all appearing "correct" in a web browser on any device that uses the router.
- Disable unnecessary services. Eg, if you use a computer on its own (not part of a LAN) then you don't need Server, SMB, SSDP Discovery, UPnP Device Host, etc, running or those SMB ports left wide open (as even W11 does by default). Consumers sure as hell don't need "authorized backdoors" like Remote Registry, Remote Desktop, Secondary Login, Windows Remote Management, etc, designed for corporations enabled and yet consumer W10-11 doesn't disable them by default...

OS updates are way down the list at best in 7th place and yet many people often over-focus on "OS updates = secure and that's that" to such an extent they often become complacent at getting the above basics right...
avatar
neumi5694: No, I actually mean the metadata, not just logs of your input. I mean how long you visited what part of a webpage, that stuff. Our website admin showed me all the info he can extract from someone visiting our site, it 's .... remarkable. Once you have seen that, you can just smile at the "windows spyware".
You mean a websites server logs that logs how long visitors stay on each page, their screen resolution, etc, for their own site? Well obviously. It's like saying "Did you know your phone company knows how many phone calls you make?" Yes, yes I did! They even bill me for it! That's not quite the same as someone who isn't your phone company demanding to know same information, nor has anything to do with what people dislike about W10 (usually telemetry on steroids + forced updates + the dumbing down of consumer Pro ability to disable stuff + forcing disabled stuff / uninstalled apps to reenable / reinstall after updates which drives some to disable all updates just for some sense of sanity / stability)...
Post edited May 01, 2023 by BrianSim
avatar
neumi5694: No, I actually mean the metadata, not just logs of your input. I mean how long you visited what part of a webpage, that stuff. Our website admin showed me all the info he can extract from someone visiting our site, it 's .... remarkable. Once you have seen that, you can just smile at the "windows spyware".
avatar
BrianSim: You mean a websites server logs that logs how long visitors stay on each page, their screen resolution, etc, for their own site? Well obviously. It's like saying "Did you know your phone company knows how many phone calls you make?" Yes, yes I did! They even bill me for it! That's not quite the same as someone who isn't your phone company demanding to know same information, nor has anything to do with what people dislike about W10 (usually telemetry on steroids + forced updates + the dumbing down of consumer Pro ability to disable stuff + forcing disabled stuff / uninstalled apps to reenable / reinstall after updates which drives some to disable all updates just for some sense of sanity / stability)...
... You are still complaining about Windows knowing what the others can find out about you? Seriously?
Ok, have fun then and live an illusion.
avatar
neumi5694: You are still complaining about Windows knowing what the others can find out about you? Seriously?
Given that's what the thread is ultimately about, yes "seriously". Just because it's 'normal' for anything and everything to want to monetize your data doesn't mean intentional over-sharing is a good thing.
avatar
Pheace: Is it me or am I lacking a distinct security concern here?
avatar
AB2012: Lack of security patches is both a valid concern but also gets way overblown often into the realms of hysterical paranoia (reaction to Spectre / Meltdown was absurd in the big picture of things. "Quick, quick we need to cripple performance and disable hyper-threading in gaming rigs and, and...").

The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th most important PC security thing the end user can do are:-

- Not give out personal information to that nice man on the phone.
- Not reuse passwords across sites
- Enable 2FA
- Switch to a whitelist firewall (that stops anything phoning home)
- Change the default password on their router (this is what hackers will see long before they even attempt to hack a PC sitting behind it. Changing the password stops them changing the router's default DNS server to a compromised one that redirects to a cloned banking site with web address and security certificate all appearing "correct" in a web browser on any device that uses the router.
- Disable unnecessary services. Eg, if you use a computer on its own (not part of a LAN) then you don't need Server, SMB, SSDP Discovery, UPnP Device Host, etc, running or those SMB ports left wide open (as even W11 does by default). Consumers sure as hell don't need "authorized backdoors" like Remote Registry, Remote Desktop, Secondary Login, Windows Remote Management, etc, designed for corporations enabled and yet consumer W10-11 doesn't disable them by default...

OS updates are way down the list at best in 7th place and yet many people often over-focus on "OS updates = secure and that's that" to such an extent they often become complacent at getting the above basics right...
1,2,3 won't prevent your computer being compromised and 4 and 6 are things an average person will rarely have done, while most people will update their OS somewhat regularly (if unwillingly on newer OS'es). OS updates are important because these are security improvements that will actually happen on a somewhat regular basis.

But yes, as I said before, serious security practices should be used if you use an unsupported OS, something the average person does not do, and most people (in the case of the latter few options you mentioned) simply don't have the knowhow to do.
Post edited May 01, 2023 by Pheace
avatar
blindich: If you've been on Steam, you know what this is about. The app is dropping Win7/8 support at the end of the year.

Never mind that your Win7/8 games still run fine on your machine--no Steam app, no games, period.

They claim it's due to Google Chrome dropping support... maybe it is, maybe not, but the fact is that there are millions of customers going to get screwed out of their property unless we bend the knee and accept Microsoft's datamining-as-an-OS-nightmare.

Yes, I know it's all in the licensing agreement. I know they have a legal right. It doesn't matter, because GOG shows how to do it right--downloadable, DRM-free installers (exceptions notwithstanding) and actual ownership of your media.

It's an old-fashioned idea that I think will be coming back into vogue very soon.

Anyway, my fervent prayer is that GOG does not/will not drop Win7/8 support for Galaxy. It's pointless to ask for a promise, yet I'd love to know where things stand.

Because I'm ready to re-buy whatever games GOG and Steam have in common, and there are a lot of very angry Steam users out there who would likely do the same.... IF there were assurances that dropping legacy OS support isn't around the corner.
This change by Steam is especially annoying because some games do not run on Win 10 but require Win 7 or older.
Well, I guess you could freeze (block updates) to an old version of steam, and then transfer games from one (1in 10) PC to another (win 7) PC via LAN. This would work until your steam version got corrupted. ( I did this when they updated form the Old Library to the New One in 2021.
I intend to dual-boot 7pro/10pro by the end of the year, or move to linux....

I tried using a whitelist firewall once, and it broke in the middle of launching a game. It was a nightmare and I couldn't add anything to the whitelist for about a year. (Yes, I didn't know what was broken, and I'd been stupid enough to install a firewall that didn't have an uninstaller at the time.) I couldn't join a multiplayer game, and only those things that had been previously allowed to connect could still connect.
avatar
AS882010M0: 1) They are not Obsolete, Win 7 brought 64 bit operation, expand-ability to 128gb RAM. Larger drive storage support, SATA III, USB 3.0 and so forth. (from 32bit XP exclusive)
2) Win 10/11, brought no HW or SW innovation or improvement, it's all Downgrade and taking control of your computer.
3) GoG will lose plenty of money if users cannot buy easily through the launcher, though you can do it all on the website. Don't delete games before 2024. Shut down all steam upgrades in November and play offline.
I cannot find my steam games on GoG, so it's not a simple switch like that.
Win 10 final with just service patches = no more income from OS for MS, not likely to be implemented.
W8 (or, fwiw, 10, because most people skipped 8) brought native SSD support (7 lacks this, and only supports SSDs through a patch.)
10 brought DX12.
avatar
BrianSim: Not really. All of the W7 "telemetry" (and upgrade to W10 nag) updates that contained it could be skipped whilst the "slipstream packs" like Simplix already pre-stripped them out. W10-11's telemetry problem comes with forced updates, ie you can't skip them. That's the "big thing" that's always made W10-11 telemetry, etc, a far worse problem than everything that came before even had W7, etc, had the same Telemetry (which they weren't even in the same ballpark). Also, XP had no telemetry.
FWIW, 2 tech friends of mine STRONGLY recommend "Blackbird" because "it defeats win 10's telemetry"
Post edited May 01, 2023 by Microfish_1
You don't whitelist games but websites, aka surfing. You DMZ a port for the server you play on. Or DMZ a general game port and force all games to use the same.

Uhm, no, I just plugged in an SSD to my Win 7 machine and it recognized it as a storage device.
Unless you had Win 7 home or beta, not sure which one was incomplete anymore. I ran Win 7 Pro from get go.
Post edited May 02, 2023 by AS882010M0
avatar
AS882010M0: You don't whitelist games but websites, aka surfing. You DMZ a port for the server you play on. Or DMZ a general game port and force all games to use the same.

Uhm, no, I just plugged in an SSD to my Win 7 machine and it recognized it as a storage device.
Unless you had Win 7 home or beta, not sure which one was incomplete anymore. I ran Win 7 Pro from get go.
I had comodo firewall, booted a game, and it minimized the game to ask "can this program connect to the net" it did this with every single program that wanted to connect, until i set it to "guess for yourself and don't bother me anymore". Well, one time i had to cram down my PC because it hung. it was never the same after that.

And I was thinking of NVMe drives. You have to slipstream something into them to get 7 to recognize them.
https://winraid.level1techs.com/t/guide-how-to-get-win7-clean-installed-onto-an-nvme-ssd/33363
I'm also on 7 Pro out-of-the-box
Post edited May 02, 2023 by Microfish_1
I forgot to comment on a couple of things in my previous post in this thread, including this quoted statement:
avatar
blindich: there are millions of customers going to get screwed out of their property
To install any game on Steam, you literally have to agree to a "Subscriber Agreement" first, which is proof that all you actually bought from Steam was a subscription, and nothing more, which lets you rent your games from them so long as you comply with whatever terms of the rental they feel like imposing.

GOG may be a bit better in that it doesn't have a "Subscriber Agreement," but the EULAs on GOG games are probably not much better than Steam's "Subscriber Agreement" is (and some of GOG's games EULA's even require the customer to agree to let the game install spyware on their system, including the most recent Pathfinder game which has been the #1 top seller on GOG for much of this week).

So the OP's connotation that GOG is a rosey paradise compared to Steam is not super accurate IMO.

As for wanting GOG Galaxy to continue to support Windows 7 & 8: I expect GOG wouldn't go out of their way to break compatibility, and they also won't go out of their to maintain compatibility either. Chances are Windows 7 will stop working with Galaxy eventually.

And I'm also confused about why the OP wants reassurances that dropping support won't be "around the corner," thus implying he's okay with them dropping support at a later date. If that is so, then why not just upgrade your OS now, since you are going to concede to doing it later on anyway?
I am Pretty confused here. The Official requirements for Galaxy 2.0 are:

-Windows 8 or newer with the latest system updates.
-Mac OS 10.15 or newer with the latest system updates.

So I understand that Windows 7 wasn't officially supported since the beginning. It can could run, though.