Enebias: None (minus CDPR's own games, obviously).
Almost the entirety of "AAA" (such arrogance in this self-determined definition!) games consists of awful games where "fun" has been erased in favor of "engagement" and "recurring user spending", a.k.a. not legally gambling which is totally gambling in the end. The good non-indie games are all to be found in the middle-shelf section, works like Divinity Original Sin or Senua's Sacrifice. That's why I'm happy Focus is releasing more games lately, they fit the definition of what I want perfectly.
AAAs can rot where they are.
Second the sentiment we dont need more souless no mans sky / call of duty / world of warcrafts hybrids that focus 90% of their budget on advertisement, 5% on trying to get their chimera to function and the other 5% to reuse the exact same assets of the previous iterations.
Indie is where its at; it's just the idea has to be good offering some long term replayability.
By not being money grubbing ultracapitalist douches (because they can't having a tenuous following saving them from obscurity) their products are more hit than miss.
The misses are also usually obvious; i mean how many are trying to cash in on dwarf fortresses famel they just copy a lack of general control, forget in depth world building because it'd take years and try to update the graphics; and it just turns out an obvious shill.
I wouldn't mind if the only AAA's were brought to us by CDPR I just wish i was interested in some of their design choices (looking at you combat system in witcher series); because i'm not going to buy a product to essentially just donate money to a company.
If they bring out a game that can hold good value i'll pay a good price for it, but GOG for me has done their dash with pre orders (with the mount & blade viking expansion).
If they haven't got good enough will for top dollar back right away it's because "you can't be both a jerk and a godsend then expect anyone to treat you better than simply human".