Orkhepaj: is it as good as tomb raider?
IMHO Uncharted 1 - 3 are as good or better than Tomb Raider, but Uncharted 4...
... is a mess.
It's a strangely paced, cobbled-together story that is trying harder to be more "meaningful" than fun. Tones and themes are thrown around in a way that makes the final product feel self-indulgent -- the work of someone who has "important" things to say over simply telling a good adventure yarn.
IMO Uncharted 4 suffered from Druckman's incredible success writing / directing The Last of Us. After his "deification" over the storytelling in that game, Druckman fired Amy Hennig, who had written all prior Uncharted games (she wrote the initial first draft of Uncharted 4 as well) and took over the story responsibilities on Uncharted 4... and you can tell. While not IMO spouting politics -- like his The Last of Us II -- Uncharted 4 wants to be profound but forgets to be fun.
Now this doesn't mean Uncharted 4 is without any good scenes and action set-pieces. It still has many elements of what could have been a successful game of the genre (and it did very well critically and in sales)... but they're not arranged in a way that creates plot momentum... and they pale in relation to 2 and 3 for size and scale.
Having been a huge fan of the Uncharted games since 1, I couldn't stand 4. In fact I finally sold the PS4 disc a month or two back because I finally came to terms with never caring to play the game again.
So is it better than Tomb Raider?
I think Uncharted 2 and 3 (possibly 1) are great games and on par (or better) than Tomb Raider (reboot). But if I had a chance to play Uncharted 4 or the Tomb Raider (reboot) games, I'd rather play Tomb Raider. While not perfect, those games at least never forgot that they needed to be adventures! And don't even get me started on Uncharted 4's standalone dlc game where they got rid of Nathan Drake... ugh...
Druckman... yuck