HunchBluntley: This seems like a non-sequitur. Do you mean that because few people have mentioned Doom, that must mean that those not mentioning it haven't played it? If so, I would invite you to read the thread title again. ;P
Austrobogulator: If the oldest game someone's beaten is from the 2000s, then that person couldn't have beaten Doom because Doom came out in the 90s.
Anyway, ignore me...sometimes I get a little too obsessive and weird about Doom. In my mind, it feels like a game that's essential for everyone to play. But, also, yeah, I know that's not really true - everyone should just play whatever they feel like :)
But you didn't comment about people not having
beaten Doom. You said "have not
played" it. :) I, for example, have played
Doom (the shareware episode, anyway), but I haven't beaten it (probably not even that shareware version). And I know that the majority of people who buy or play any given game never play it to completion -- but that doesn't mean that they never played it. Hell, there are video games I've spent dozens, if not hundreds, of hours in that I've never finished. In many cases, I haven't even come close (though not always for lack of trying/lack of interest).
Any given person whose oldest mentioned game is post-'93 could've played
Doom, but never finished it. Or they played and finished a friend's copy, or finished their or a parent's copy, but later sold or otherwise lost it (remember that owning the game is a qualification the OP made).
I mean, it's all good. I was just trying to point out the flaw in your reasoning. :)