Navagon: I agree.

anjohl: I know full well the correct definitions of words as I can easily look them up. However, I am instead inclined to post common misconceptions with a typically misplaced sense of arrogance and authority on the subject in a deliberately inflammatory manner. This is all in an attempt to provoke the very flame wars I so frequently lie about not wanting to be a part of. I call this .process *trolling*.

Navagon: You're such a special little snowflake, you know that?

sheepdragon: I lol'd. Though I did that even without the edit. Because whether or not he is serious, he just seems like a very arrogant and stupid apatheist, which by his definition could be regarded as a religion in itself. Particularly by the way of his "arguments".
EDIT:
I have to say, though, I agree with the "active exclusion" method mentioned in that link.
EDIT2:
By the hells, the edit function completely borks the quotations.

Navagon: Sometimes the quotations work perfectly, but that's certainly the least frequent outcome.
Apatheism was introduced to me earlier in this thread. I've got to admit it does make a lot of sense on the whole. I don't know if it's practical, given human nature though. But it's nice in theory and no doubt it works for some people.

sheepdragon: I lol'd. Though I did that even without the edit. Because whether or not he is serious, he just seems like a very arrogant and stupid apatheist, which by his definition could be regarded as a religion in itself. Particularly by the way of his "arguments".

anjohl: Apatheism sounds close to my overal worldview regarding religion, sure.
But the swimming pool is a lot deeper than that, and you will want a stronger rope than a wiki to get down there.
I have stated before, when using the popular definition, I am VERY arrogant. The reason for this is because I don't believe in humility. In fact, I don't believe in ANYTHING, but humility I actively scorn. If I have a talent or ability, I will not waste energy hiding it or downplaying it.
So, to an individual only used to being around people who all agree on this ridiculous mutual "social contract" of medicority, I will come off as aloof, arrogant, a jerk, etc.
Now, I am 1/3 of those above all the time, and 2/3's more than enough. But, to paint me with your broad brush as a "troll" illustrates a glaring lack of observation. I have intentionally posted comments on this site to incite a reaction TWICE, and TWICE only.

sheepdragon: It's hard to tell when someone is acting very aggressively, but I do agree on some points of what you say.
True agnosticism do exist. But I find it very close to apatheism, in the way that agnosticism can, in a very simple way, be summed up with "I don't know", and that apatheism is "I don't know, and I don't care". Some people consider themselves agnostic, but are actually deists, but it's all a question of definition, which is then igtheism. With all this different labels, the "strong" and "weak" atheism labels are basically redundant.
I don't dwell much on it, but when I think into it, I would overall consider myself an atheist, as in that I don't see anything that directly proves the existence of a deity, and that there are several things that mankind will probably still discover, and many more that we probably won't, but that can turn both ways, and beyond that I don't actually care. Which in the end actually makes me an apatheist, with a strong distaste to any major organised religion, because of what it can do to people. Yay, definitions. And I could still go on, if I could be bothered.
So, I think I actually agree with you on several points, apart from interpretations I would call more personal.
By the way, the wiki was just for the definitions, as they usually get that right, and I won't have to start explaining it in my half-assed manner.
EDIT:
Oh, and I never said anything about humility. You should never hold back, but that doesn't mean you have to be an asshole, and start insulting when people don't understand what you mean with your statements. By doing so, you make yourself seem less credible, and easy to brush aside as a troll.

anjohl: I am not an apatheist then, if the idea is "I don't know, and I don't care". I am curious, but only curious. If an answer is unknowable, the question is irrelevant, and is therefore of no consequence. The entire human perception of god is a construct INTENDED to defy logic/rationality by design. If "god" were anything lesser, it would not be god, would it?
Cat's create gods too. They are called people.