Posted June 08, 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed2e7/ed2e770944c9fc89c230c602660c413b7d6a7996" alt="avatar"
Not exactly a review, but he wrote an article about RPG's, and how they should be simplified with no numbers, and used Bioshock as an example, which pissed me off. Good riddance that guy at least.
Haven't read anything by the others though.
I never wrote anything of the kind, and never even played Bioshock, so you must have me confused with someone else. If you're going to slander me, at least ensure you're attributing your criticism to the correct person.
That said, I don't think there's anything wrong with voicing your opinion that you don't miss the columns, etc., and shouldn't feel any obligation to temper that belief by concern that someone is losing that job. All that really matters is that you enjoy the magazine and feel it offers you enough value to pay for it -- if that's not the case, people are always interested in hearing why and how you think it can be improved.
I just wrote about games as a passionate hobby, in any event -- wrote editorials and maintained my own RPG News website for almost 15 years for GameSpot, Computer Gaming World and finally PC Gamer, and am happy that hundreds of readers have written me over the years appreciating my crazy strategy guides and comprehensive reviews. I enjoyed writing my articles based upon hundreds of hours of experience with the RPGs I played - which, frankly, was far beyond what you could reasonably expect from writers who are dependent upon game writing for a living, since they have to play several games/week and write several articles in order to earn more than a few pennies. I actually think dedicated "hobbyists", are capable of offering the more considered and informed reviews, and I enjoyed contributing to game writing on that basis.
Peace.
Post edited June 08, 2009 by Desslock