It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)is gog still beta?(50 posts)(50 posts)
(50 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
This is my favourite topic
Posted June 13, 2009
this is not interesting enough to have been resurrected
Posted June 13, 2009
avatar
Breakfast: There is a marked difference between websites of today and websites of a decade ago, not only in terms of technology and design but also audience interaction (e.g., read/write versus read-only). It is simply a way of acknowledging that change.
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: While there certainly is a difference between many professional websites today and those of 10-15 years ago, the change has been of such a gradual and piecemeal nature that there is simply nothing specific or distinct for any term attempting to describe the change to capture. "Web 2.0" is basically just taking a snapshot of the current state of web development, then pretending that ti's something that actually needs its own special title. It's pointless and silly.

Isn't that what I said?
Posted June 13, 2009
avatar
captfitz: this is not interesting enough to have been resurrected

Hmm. Kind of true! :)
I mean, as long as I can still buy awesome GOG I don't care what they call it ;).
Posted June 13, 2009
avatar
Wishbone: Isn't that what I said?

Yeah, pretty much. You just made your post while I was still writing up mine, so I didn't see I was being redundant until I'd already posted.
Posted June 14, 2009
avatar
captfitz: this is not interesting enough to have been resurrected

Concurred.
Pages:
1
2
3
4
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)is gog still beta?(50 posts)(50 posts)
(50 posts)