Posted February 12, 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/989cc/989cc9fc850bac7dff0d2447d3fc6c101fcf1ce2" alt="avatar"
Two opinions, both are correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d356/7d356d0cc10350d08dc8898c98c0edf2da08c066" alt="avatar"
1) If the information upon which an opinion is based is incomplete or inaccurate, then the opinion can be disregarded. Despite popular belief, an opinion can be wrong.
2) Calling something 'an opinion' does not magically protect it from criticism. If an opinion, certainly in the form of a review, fails to take into account aspects (or issues) that are apparent to everyone else, then the opinion and its author can be taken to task.
3) Professional reviews are held to a higher standard than non-professional reviews. Fanboy gushing and tales of a games lack of flaws are fine from amateur bloggers who just want to spout their view. If a professional does the same, they had better be right.
When a glowing review of a game fails to mention or point out issues that are apparent to everyone else, then the foundation upon which the review is built becomes suspect, and the review itself can be considered at best 'wrong', and at worst 'dishonest'.
More so with games, there are some aspects that are not subjective. For example: excessive reuse of the same map, ropey AI, low res textures, missing or incomplete animations etc. If these things, which are likely apparent to everyone else, are not mentioned in a review, then the review becomes suspect, and the reviewer can be considered incompetent.
So, no. You can have two differing opinions, you can have a hundred differing opinions, but not all of them will be right, or valid, or in any way useful. And the argument of "it's only their opinion" is an invalid one, as it exists solely to try and stifle debate, and to attempt to protect the incompetent reviewers from critique.
I yield. Have fun.