Shadowstalker16: Especially to the level of eating into the hands of a vague as hell ''rule'' that gives all power to the moderators to remove and even misquote what they do not like. That could be certainly be interpreted as wanting zero accountability from those in the position of power as long as they agree with you.
Erpy: Seeing that this is a privately owned forum, the moderation staff ALREADY has all the power to remove what they don't like. It's a popular myth among nettizens that the simple act of visiting or posting on a forum makes them entitled to "hold those in the position of power accountable". That's not how it works. Forum owners generally want to make an effort to listen to forum members as a matter of fairness, but in the end, they're not accountable to them.
If the GOG management determine that permitting homophobic rants on their community forums is in their best interests, there's little any member can do against it except make a case that they're wrong about it in an attempt to change their minds.
Likewise if the GOG management determine that keeping homophobic rants out of their community forums is in their best interests, they can delete those posts without the obligation to justify that decision to the members.
The accountability you talk about is a mirage.
Yes. First off, posting on the forum should not be regarded as a right - it's more of a privilege. Secondly, yes, we set the rules. We could even go as far as saying that we can remove whatever we feel is inappropriate, even if that's massively subjective.