It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
AstralWanderer: Point out the neverending sales with up to 90% off[
Those often have 1-2 titles on heavy discount that have been on heavy discount before. Much like when i worked at a certain grocery store, they put the eggs and milk in the back of the store, that way you have to pass by all the other product and you're far more likely to grab some items on the way through.

The biggest reason to purchase said game(s) is more likely to get the latest updates to the games, and they might get updated elsewhere eventually, or not at all. I'd re-bought my D&D games because patching them was notoriously annoying and getting them pre-patched with the latest patches was reason enough. But that was back in 2014.

But yes getting them at high discount would likely make most of everyone happy.
avatar
Zimerius: It is easy enough to turn this one around. I mean, do you take other people for fools or what? Theft is one of the most common practices all around the world, and you are simple enough to complain about stuff taken when you take no security measures whatsoever. I suggest you keep this attitude only for when you visit the butterfly ball

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoALdH-Cpsc
avatar
timppu: People, don't do drugs.
well at least that is a strategy, act like a 16-year-old girl when you're loosing and turn full secure male if you have the advantage
I don't know if it have been said earlier by anyone, but at least about some piracy sites GOG is too passive.
I'm not going to name anything but I'm sure that more than a few active GOGers here are aware of some certain sites that have specialized in offering for free all the offline installers of the entire GOG catalogue. (In fact not only do they share the installers, they also share the whole goodies pack, complete editions, pre-order bonuses etc.)

I do understand that piracy will never die as some people are so used to illegally download stuff (not just video games) that for them piracy sites are almost what GOG or other official platforms are for legit users and as you can see some of them literally come in here asking for help with certain games oblivious of the fact they do not own the said game they want to be helped with.

GOG could at least try to legally pursue these kind of sites who blatantly share their entire catalogue.

I mean look at the short work Nintendo did with their Switch emulator yuzu. In one month after the filling of the lawsuit yuzu ceased to be and the people behind it settled and disbanded the whole project.
Post edited March 27, 2024 by Naathir
^ I agree with the above mentioned. Not only GOG alone, but united with the other major online stores (Steam, Epic, etc.) they could try to eliminate the shady sites. They could unite for that cause at least. And they could succeed.
avatar
Naathir: I'm not going to name anything but I'm sure that more than a few active GOGers here are aware of some certain sites that have specialized in offering for free all the offline installers of the entire GOG catalogue. (In fact not only do they share the installers, they also share the whole goodies pack, complete editions, pre-order bonuses etc.)
I am sure those sites appreciate your free advertisement.

If I understood right, some here even feel stealing is quite normal and shouldn't be avoided, something about "visiting butterfly balls" and trippy shit like that.

avatar
Naathir: GOG could at least try to legally pursue these kind of sites who blatantly share their entire catalogue.

I mean look at the short work Nintendo did with their Switch emulator yuzu. In one month after the filling of the lawsuit yuzu ceased to be and the people behind it settled and disbanded the whole project.
GOG doesn't have the money of Nintendo.

Also maybe it should actually be the game publishers who go against such sites... but then small indie studios are in no better situation to sue such sites, so...

Most of such sites are probably in Russia and China, under Putin's and Xi Jinping's personal protection. Good luck suing them.
Post edited March 27, 2024 by timppu
avatar
CarChris: ^ I agree with the above mentioned. Not only GOG alone, but united with the other major online stores (Steam, Epic, etc.) they could try to eliminate the shady sites. They could unite for that cause at least. And they could succeed.
Well, they take forever to delete shady spam bot threads on their own official forum, I'd wager taking legal action against any pirate website would take much much more effort. Succeeding would require investing a lot of money for very little or no benefit at all. A new piracy website can be created in days, closing one can take months or years.
avatar
Naathir: I mean look at the short work Nintendo did with their Switch emulator yuzu. In one month after the filling of the lawsuit yuzu ceased to be and the people behind it settled and disbanded the whole project.
And the project was forked, and the encryption and bios part was removed so it's closer to PCSX2, and it still exists.

Hit it on the head, 3 more will crop up. But you piss off more and more of your customer base.

I've been anti-nintendo since they took down a HTML5 fan project to show you could make level 1-1 of mario using just HTML5. They've shown themselves to be assholes, so i'm not giving them any money, no matter how popular their console may be.
Post edited March 27, 2024 by rtcvb32
avatar
rtcvb32: And the project was forked, and the encryption and bios part was removed so it's closer to PCSX2, and it still exists.HTML5.
One of the forks was graciously named SuYu
Post edited March 27, 2024 by Dark_art_
avatar
Naathir: I mean look at the short work Nintendo did with their Switch emulator yuzu. In one month after the filling of the lawsuit yuzu ceased to be and the people behind it settled and disbanded the whole project.
avatar
rtcvb32: And the project was forked, and the encryption and bios part was removed so it's closer to PCSX2, and it still exists.

Hit it on the head, 3 more will crop up. But you piss off more and more of your customer base.

I've been anti-nintendo since they took down a HTML5 fan project to show you could make level 1-1 of mario using just HTML5. They've shown themselves to be assholes, so i'm not giving them any money, no matter how popular their console may be.
I don't mind Yuzu when properly used. If you own the game and want to play it on faster hardware and get 60 FPS on more demanding games. A few others may want to play the game we own without telemetry on sp games they will use to data harvest our Switch profile they can use with their marketing department or sell it to someone else. Bandai Namco may be guilty of this and newer physical EnixSquare games require you to agree to a TOS. One of them is Octopath 2 and another is Saturnellia.
Absolutely disgusting.

edit: Nintendo has enough marketshare they could tell those companies they are NOT allowed to data scrape those profiles, they are under Nintendo and 3rd parties do NOT have the right to access them. Instead Nintendo is apathetic to it. The same goes with MS in this same case with XBox games and people's XBox profile.
Post edited March 27, 2024 by Sarang
avatar
rtcvb32: And the project was forked, and the encryption and bios part was removed so it's closer to PCSX2, and it still exists.
avatar
Dark_art_: One of the forks was graciously named SuYu
Nintendo already went after it.

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/03/gitlab-takes-down-nintendo-switch-emulator-suyu-due-to-the-dmca/

They're limping on somewhere apparently, though.
avatar
BreOl72: if you encounter such a "help needed for game X" - thread, created by a new and empty account (always check the "Registered" date and the account)...DON'T TRY AND HELP.

If you help them, you are (involuntarily) supporting piracy.

Instead tell the "user" in question to legally purchase their GOG games.
avatar
RoboPond: So how do you know they are pirating GOG games? Do you have any actual proof or is it just an assumption because its an account that's posting asking for help with 0 games?

For all you know it could be an alt account for just posting on the forums (i'm willing to bet that there are people that want to keep their main account as private as possible but still engage with the forums), or something as innocent as that.

But of course they could also be pirating GOG games, but non-of us will know for sure.
Alt accounts are against the GOG TOS. If they have alt accounts, they are violating he rules abd the account should be nuked anyway.
avatar
paladin181: Alt accounts are against the GOG TOS. If they have alt accounts, they are violating he rules abd the account should be nuked anyway.
Of course, given that GOG can't even take out spam that registered a month ago...
avatar
CarChris: ^ I agree with the above mentioned. Not only GOG alone, but united with the other major online stores (Steam, Epic, etc.) they could try to eliminate the shady sites. They could unite for that cause at least. And they could succeed.
Other stores wouldn't help GOG to take down sites that are imitating GOG specifically.

Yes GOG could take them down, but that would take a lot of time & money on GOG's part, which would be wasted money which gives GOG zero value in return, since the users of those sites wouldn't be buying GOG games anyway, even if those sites had never existed.

And new warez sites would always crop up to replace the ones that GOG has taken down.

So, if GOG were to start trying to take those sites down, then that would be akin to GOG flushing its money down the toilet.
Post edited March 27, 2024 by Ancient-Red-Dragon
avatar
krakataul: Why does it matter how long do I need to make a profit if I am the author
avatar
rtcvb32: Because that's the argument used over and over to extend the copyright length.

Besides, who created/invented the Little Mermaid? It wasn't Disney, they just made an iteration FROM PUBLIC DOMAIN that they then claim rights over, and if anyone would do a better job than them they would sue them into oblivion. We've seen this already with the later Alice in Wonderland movie(s).

And as we see things going into public domain, like Whinnie the Pooh, had it been shorter i'm sure the first thing that others would do, is further stories of Christopher Robin, and other tales, not horror films Blood and Honey. Shorter duration would mean those with a passion and love for it would likely extend the story and works far better and faster, rather than someone picking it up purely based on the name of familiarity.

Also as i've seen over and over, companies that buy up intellectual ideas and rights, overload themselves become complacent fat and lazy and the most evil companies you can imagine (EA, Disney, Activation Blizzard) who were once lean and very competitive and good companies. They have such backlogs of properties they feel they can resell it infinitely forever. No, if the duration of copyright was short, then companies would have to... ACTUALLY be creative and make things rather than revisiting the old well over and over again.

Worse companies see ownership of properties as such where they'd rather destroy it rather than let everyone have it. Don't believe me? There's many racing games, console games, arcade games that are lost to time or don't run at all because they require online connectivity to work, and they won't have the sources when it's time to release it, no they are vapor-ware, and far more would be if archiving wasn't being done. And with the greediness of current companies they want all the older stuff to go bye-bye so you have to get the newest latest and greatest which they can turn off at any time, or to outlaw emulation and make older games you buy only live within the window when THEY decide to release hardware or discs, which isn't very often, once they let it go they expect it to die, or flip a kill switch, or never having it on hand in the first place (streaming) Permanently, as much as you will own nothing.
Main misunderstanding seems to be: you are talking about corporate owned copyright, and I am concerned about individual authors (H.C.Andersen, C. Robin, M. Twain, E. Hemingway, J.R.R. Tolkien, A. Sapkowski or Lucas Pope, Jeff Vogel...etc.) as I don't see how can you take away authors ownership during their lifetime? Some may try to make money by writing books or making games, or may decide to destroy their work like Kafka did (try), but it is theirs to do what they want with it - even if they decide to transfer/sell/licence their artistic property to some company/corporation.
In EU, copyright protects author's intellectual property until 70 years after death or, in the case of collaboration, 70 years after the death of the last surviving author.

I guess you are focused on corporate copyright, in EU it lasts for 70 years after publication. In USA it is something like 95-125 years if I remember correctly. It seems little exaggerated, but then again, that's U.S. politics for you :)
avatar
RoboPond: Ok then. But just because of that then why are you painting all accounts with 0 owned games with the same brush?
avatar
BreOl72: Let's call it experience.

[...]
or, as we professionals like to call it - guilty until proven innocent