Posted January 25, 2020
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/61666937496480af6342b2ef3e059633bfe5a41be227303d87135ce406288629_avm.jpg)
Generally speaking, for the same amount of money I would rather own 1-2 games than rent 10-20 games.
In any case, I think it's important to have the option to buy (even if I preferred renting). I imagine most GOG users are the same way; otherwise they'd be taking advantage of Scheme's prices and monopoly-like foothold in the market (sadly, many people view GOG as "shady" or "untrustworthy" because of bs like false positives or ignorant attitudes like thinking companies in different countries are trying to scam them or something).
In an ideal world, people would have the option of both renting and buying. However, my impression is that there is this sort of agenda out there to kill off ownership/user control of what they buy. Look at all TV/movies that is now "stream-only". My view is that to buy from Scheme or support similar practices is harmful to the general concept of ownership, if people go by the theory of "vote with your wallet".
Kudos to OP for supporting GOG even at a higher price.