It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Considering some of the proposals in the wishlist, does anyone really think that e.g. "Mirrors Edge" could be considered Good Old Game™ in ten years time?
Post edited March 12, 2009 by Hadakan
Ahh Mirrors Edge is fairly good. Sure its got quite a few annoying bits but as a game its pretty solid
I was going to put in Girls Gone Wild: The Game as a joke.
avatar
michaelleung: I was going to put in Girls Gone Wild: The Game as a joke.
there is a playboy game, one game you could request that would never ever make it on here, is the man game.
because it is illegal to show a minor in a pornographic material, and one of the "ladies" is 17.
avatar
michaelleung: I was going to put in Girls Gone Wild: The Game as a joke.
avatar
Weclock: there is a playboy game, one game you could request that would never ever make it on here, is the man game.
because it is illegal to show a minor in a pornographic material, and one of the "ladies" is 17.

I hope this doesn't completely derail this thread.
Technically, it is only illegal to show an actual minor in pornographic settings (photo, film/video), artistic or virtual representations of minors in pornographic settings (i.e. paintings, drawings, pixels in a game, etc.) are perfectly legal, at least in the US, where artistic representations fall under the First Amendment protections. I ain't saying its right, but it is the way it is.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/scotus.virtual.child.porn/
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2007/07/26/CHILDPORN.ART_ART_07-26-07_A1_SF7CML1.html
except it is an actual minor.
avatar
Weclock: there is a playboy game, one game you could request that would never ever make it on here, is the man game.
because it is illegal to show a minor in a pornographic material, and one of the "ladies" is 17.
avatar
cogadh: I hope this doesn't completely derail this thread.
Technically, it is only illegal to show an actual minor in pornographic settings (photo, film/video), artistic or virtual representations of minors in pornographic settings (i.e. paintings, drawings, pixels in a game, etc.) are perfectly legal, at least in the US, where artistic representations fall under the First Amendment protections. I ain't saying its right, but it is the way it is.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/scotus.virtual.child.porn/
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2007/07/26/CHILDPORN.ART_ART_07-26-07_A1_SF7CML1.html

Pornographic settings? Hell, you should see my friend's Facebook pictures.
avatar
Weclock: except it is an actual minor.

Ah, I see. That's different.