It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
When the whole copyright discussion came up a long time ago, people who would copy without a license were labeled as pirates... and I have to admit that I wasn't even really aware how much the "fight against piracy" really boiled down to how well you could separate the offenders from the normal people with just one little word: pirates.
If you have to describe them as "license violators" (because that's what pirates really are, in violation of a license), people will stop seeing them as "a big force of evil" and more like "normal people who are under attack by some big company because of a tiny little mistake they made".
Well, guess what: There are real pirates now (Somalia) and they are definitely the bigger story. The term piracy for license violations is being removed from next year's dictionaries as we speak.
I wonder what will happen next? I think this development could easy kill the ideological part of fighting copyright violation. It just goes back to being a minor sin, like walking across a red traffic light.
avatar
hansschmucker: There are real pirates now

We all know they stole the idea from warez groups
I'll bet those somali illegally downloaded the software that runs their ships and database systems!
The moral is that computer piracy leads to real life piracy
Somalia would be one of the multitude of examples of the old European empires, and more recently "the west" in general, causing horrific long-term damage.
I'd be a pirate too, if I were in their position. For some of the groups, it's a very lucrative job, there were at least two cases recently where multi-million dollar payments were made for the return of an oil tanker and a large arms shipment.
You could also debate all day about the legitimacy of that arms shipment in the first place, since it was rumoured that some of the shipment was heading to Sudan (Kenya have denied this though, saying it was for their military alone.)
Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Is inevitable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AzpByR3MvI
Better link is this one.
The official, legally-recognised terminology is "copyright infringement". Another deliberate error groups make is saying "piracy is theft"; the law does not recognise copyright infringement as theft, and indeed the dictionary definition of the word does not apply to the infinite replication of intangible assets. By deliberately using incorrect terminology they have certainly made it seem a more serious offence than it actually is.

If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possess the less, because every other possess the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property

Thomas Jefferson
Which reminds me, The Public Domain by James Boyle is a very interesting book about this and is published under a Creative Commons license.
Using the term "piracy" to describe copyright infringement actually goes back to the early 1600s (before copyright was even established in 1710), so it's hardly a recent conflation of terms.
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: Using the term "piracy" to describe copyright infringement actually goes back to the early 1600s (before copyright was even established in 1710), so it's hardly a recent conflation of terms.

You just looked that up in Wikipedia, didn't you (don't worry, I did the same after reading your post)? But the fact remains, the term "piracy" hasn't been mentioned in any of the magazines I read daily ever since the Somalia situation started to develop and I'm seeing it used less and less in daily conversation.
The details, yes. That the term "piracy" has been used to describe copyright infringement for a long time is something I've known for quite a while (comes up quite often in Slashdot discussions). Certainly interesting, though, that the resurgence of high seas piracy has decreased the use of the term with regards to copyright infringement.
avatar
frostcircus: The moral is that computer piracy leads to real life piracy

Yes, but this is not a moral, this is simple, utter and mean ideology.
They're no match for the Video Pirates!