Posted February 14, 2009
When the whole copyright discussion came up a long time ago, people who would copy without a license were labeled as pirates... and I have to admit that I wasn't even really aware how much the "fight against piracy" really boiled down to how well you could separate the offenders from the normal people with just one little word: pirates.
If you have to describe them as "license violators" (because that's what pirates really are, in violation of a license), people will stop seeing them as "a big force of evil" and more like "normal people who are under attack by some big company because of a tiny little mistake they made".
Well, guess what: There are real pirates now (Somalia) and they are definitely the bigger story. The term piracy for license violations is being removed from next year's dictionaries as we speak.
I wonder what will happen next? I think this development could easy kill the ideological part of fighting copyright violation. It just goes back to being a minor sin, like walking across a red traffic light.
If you have to describe them as "license violators" (because that's what pirates really are, in violation of a license), people will stop seeing them as "a big force of evil" and more like "normal people who are under attack by some big company because of a tiny little mistake they made".
Well, guess what: There are real pirates now (Somalia) and they are definitely the bigger story. The term piracy for license violations is being removed from next year's dictionaries as we speak.
I wonder what will happen next? I think this development could easy kill the ideological part of fighting copyright violation. It just goes back to being a minor sin, like walking across a red traffic light.