It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Maybe the publishers dont consider some of their lesser known titles as "good" old games, maybe GOG should add a section called "not-so-GOG". (not so)good old games. : D
avatar
Wishbone: But the discussion is on why companies who use GOG only release their most popular games here.
avatar
domgrief: Well, this is Good Old Games. I really hope that their decision was based on whether the games met GOG's criteria on their own merit.
As much as I enjoyed Epic and Apogee's classics, I think that the vast majority of their earlier games (Traffic Department 2192? Bio Menace?) have not aged well - they just don't seem as fun to play again.
I look forward to new releases on GOG because I know that they will be critically acclaimed games which are still fun to play today. I stopped being excited by Steam's "Update News" window over a year ago now.
Maybe they could release JOG.com (Just Old Games) to allow developers to release their back catalogs :)

Well Biomenace and Duke 1&2 still worth playing. But I'm not sure if they still worth paying for it. Probably all three in a box will.
the CD of Duke Nukem 3D I have includes full versions of Duke 1&2, DN3D needs to include these items.
avatar
drmlessgames: Maybe the publishers dont consider some of their lesser known titles as "good" old games, maybe GOG should add a section called "not-so-GOG". (not so)good old games. : D

How about AOG: Any Old Game
avatar
drmlessgames: Maybe the publishers dont consider some of their lesser known titles as "good" old games, maybe GOG should add a section called "not-so-GOG". (not so)good old games. : D
avatar
Aliasalpha: How about AOG: Any Old Game

Or just OG - old games
What about SOG? (you get the idea)