Posted April 23, 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efa67/efa67c1b3638fe6e8aa9f8d8907f4fa8961d50a7" alt="avatar"
battlefield heroes isn't chock full of strategy, but it's still quite a bit slower than ql and it has objectives other than 'kill people.' i happen to like it better.
I compared them because each one is free mp game and I played them both. I didn't like BF: H because of the gameplay. FPS would be better than TPS in BF: H I think. Also maps are so small and game mechanics are not quite well. I last played BF: H closed beta 2 or 3 months ago, maybe game could be better now I don't know but I don't think so.