Posted February 09, 2009
Killed OR sterilized.
Anyway, I'm baffled by this case. IANAL, but you ARE allowed to hold trespassers until proper authorities arrive to do a formal arrest. Trespassing is illegal. After they ignore a warning to leave, you are within your right to "defend" yourself at that point.
Considering the ****ing mess these trespassers have been leaving on his property for about 10 years, and the amount of MONEY he's had to waste dealing with it (sensors, FAUCETS on his water tanks so they can steal his water without destroying the tank), plus the fact that he really has no idea when he confronts them whether or not they're armed or drugged up or whatever (some illegals DO get drugged up for the parts of the trip where they need to keep moving, read the article) I'm amazed he shows enough restraint to merely detain them until the authorities arrive.
The only loss to the illegals is that they're detained, deported and possibly fined, I dunno what happens to them. I fail to see how facing the consequences for illegal action constitutes a violation of ones civil rights. The best case they have is that he treated them cruelly, but it would have to be pretty freaking blatant and vicious before I gave a damn.
Tell me honestly: you have had detained a robber at gunpoint within your own home and your dog started growling at him. Wouldn't YOU make a joke that your dog is hungry? Seems like an obvious joke to me. No one is hurt by that.
Anyway, I'm baffled by this case. IANAL, but you ARE allowed to hold trespassers until proper authorities arrive to do a formal arrest. Trespassing is illegal. After they ignore a warning to leave, you are within your right to "defend" yourself at that point.
Considering the ****ing mess these trespassers have been leaving on his property for about 10 years, and the amount of MONEY he's had to waste dealing with it (sensors, FAUCETS on his water tanks so they can steal his water without destroying the tank), plus the fact that he really has no idea when he confronts them whether or not they're armed or drugged up or whatever (some illegals DO get drugged up for the parts of the trip where they need to keep moving, read the article) I'm amazed he shows enough restraint to merely detain them until the authorities arrive.
The only loss to the illegals is that they're detained, deported and possibly fined, I dunno what happens to them. I fail to see how facing the consequences for illegal action constitutes a violation of ones civil rights. The best case they have is that he treated them cruelly, but it would have to be pretty freaking blatant and vicious before I gave a damn.
Tell me honestly: you have had detained a robber at gunpoint within your own home and your dog started growling at him. Wouldn't YOU make a joke that your dog is hungry? Seems like an obvious joke to me. No one is hurt by that.