breakercode: If that is true when we amplify that to other sectors, you shouldn't have a Nokia if you work at Apple, you shouldn't enter an Adidas shop using Nike stuff or even use a HP Laptop while working for Lenovo, etc...
pds41: You're not comparing like with like. In "amplifying" this, you've created an entirely different scenario to the one you got into trouble for.
Examples:
You
can own a Samsung phone if you work at Apple. You
cannot go into an Apple store and tell customers to go next door and buy a Samsung instead
and expect to not be removed from the store.
You
can enter an Adidas shop while wearing Nike clothes, but you
cannot expect to be allowed to tell customers in that store that your Adidas trainers are better and they should go next door and buy trainers there instead. Again, security will remove you.
With your example about working for Lenovo, then they won't care if you use a laptop from HP. However, if you posted on social media about how much better your HP laptop was than Lenovo ones, then you might discover that you've breached the terms of your contract and get fired for misconduct.
Ultimately, don't confuse using different products with going into a store and actively advertising a competitor - which is kind of what you did. As much as I don't like Steam, I understand their response and can't criticise it.
---
mechmouse: Steam isn't JUST a store, its a huge multifaceted platform
It offers a hosted forum service, these are created and administrated by the devs and publishers of the game, and in many cases is the primary point of contact with said group.
PixelBoy: But you can't blame Steam/Valve for that.
They aren't doing anything to prevent developers/publishers using some other platforms, like competing stores or social media for that very purpose.
If they choose to use Steam forums, then it's their choice, and it is in fact they, not Valve, who is creating the problem.
All developers could simply just stop using Steam forums and go to Reddit or whatever if they wanted to.
mechmouse: Valve has dominance over PC gaming and it has control over a significant communication platform for PC gamers. If this was Microsoft doing the same kind of stuff they'd be raked over the coals for it!
PixelBoy: ---
I suppose there is some irony in the fact that Steam is actually a great counter force to Microsoft.
They offer a place to buy games, which is not Microsoft store, and they also support Linux as an alternative to Windows (more than GOG does, to add to the irony there).
---
Spectrum_Legacy: dude please don't shoot him just yet. He isn't trying to get us to buy the game over on steam, rather than getting the pub to release the game here. I wonder if they have similar CoC on steam forums that the pub moderates and disallows links to other stores too.
lupineshadow: Stop calling people dude and stop trying to play the fanboy straw man to ridiculous arguments.
Steam were well within their rights to delete OPs post on the Steam forums. They didn't have to but they chose to.
It's not censorship - it wasn't a general comment about GOG or even comparing the merits of the platforms, it was inciting people to lobby for a publisher to release on a rival platform, which would be to the direct detriment of Steam.
---
breakercode: If that is true when we amplify that to other sectors, you shouldn't have a Nokia if you work at Apple, you shouldn't enter an Adidas shop using Nike stuff or even use a HP Laptop while working for Lenovo, etc...
Grargar: Ah, my old nemesis... false equivalence. Ve meet again.
If all of this is right, why they allow CDPR to have their own games, Witcher and Cyberpunk 2077 (which are massive hits) on Steam but Valve don't do the other way arround with Portal and Half Life despite being old games ? :o