Starmaker: - reporting on hatefull bullshit is not in itself bad when it's relevant -- such as when the bullshitters are poised to run the most powerful country in the world.
- The community has argued it is not relevant, by not posting in it, leaving him to continuously bump it himself.
Starmaker: - even if you consider it unacceptable, other hate threads such as gamergate are allowed to stay.
- Other threads feature discussion, not merely link dumps.
Starmaker: - many other threads of limited interest are continually pushed to the front page.
- No other thread has been bumped nearly every single day by a sole individual, sometimes more than once per day, for several months. If it was not so extremely prevalent it would not be called spam.
Starmaker: - the posts are original content, not copypasta, and in "good-faith"-good English.
- The posts are all links being copied from elsewhere en masse, with no personal opinion stated and no invitation to discussion. I wouldn't take someone's english being good or not as a factor in calling something spam or not.
Starmaker: - the content is kept within one thread and the thread title is sufficiently descriptive for uninterested users to avoid it.
- So it's just one spam thread, it doesn't make it not spam.
Starmaker: But the last three points classify is as Definitely Not Spam.
Spam is (1) low-effort, (2) commercial, (3) unsolicited.
The Infowars thread is (1) high-effort, (2) noncommercial, (3) kept within a properly labeled thread
[techinically, most forum posts are "unsolicited" -- one of the key elements of spam is getting 'nonconsenting eyeballs'. On a forum, this means many threads, bumping threads with low-effort posts, misleading thread title, offtopic posts and addenda to posts ("fake sigs") in other threads].
And I argue that it is low-effort: it's just copy pasted links, not a well-reasoned opinion; it is commercial: it's an advertisement for his favorite show with updates every time a new episode comes out; and it is unsolicited: he, and Kleetus making fun of him, are the only regular posters in it constantly bumping it, and 99% of the other people who bothered to come and post at one point or another were asking him to stop.
Starmaker: TL;DR a thread isn't spam just because you (we) don't like it. Saying it is just devalues the complaint.
No, its political content doesn't make it spam, which by the way is why I don't oppose other threads in the forum, it's spam because of the form in which it is conveyed. If the exact same message was relayed through a discussion, I still wouldn't agree with it, but I wouldn't have a problem with it. In that same thread people have asked him to focus, to argue, not to dump links. To pick a single topic, argue for it, and let a discussion emerge, then later move to a different topic, instead of posting a hundred links at a time. But he ignored it completely, he decided to keep dumping every link he could find, he decided to spam.