Sorry about late reply - wasn't around.
prawnstar89: It's fine, we can agree to disagree on that. Free speech am I right? Haha.
One of us is contributing toward general acceptance of such practice, though. That hardly leaves me content.
prawnstar89: However, this is the kind of thing I wish people will not spread around. It is still your computer. You have the decision of whether to use any app or not. A quick browser search will show that tracking data is the general practice currently. While I do believe the developers should explicitly say "oh hey, I'm tracking your data" I am in the opinion that general public should be aware that tracking is probably expected at this time. Not just apps, but browsers too.
Just like I could "check" that RedShell was collecting all that juicy tracking information when nobody bothered to inform gamers that it was suddenly added to legitimately purchased products?
Hey, call me silly, but I'd rather just play and enjoy a game, not spend ages trying to find out what manner of dickhattery its developers decided to engage in.
The acceptance of ubiquitous tracking is a tremendous danger to the society as a whole. I'm not going to go into wall-of-text explanation as to why (especially since it's a really complex issue), but privacy was declared a cornerstone of democracies since the French philosophers began to shape the idea in modern terms.
The fact that we are giving tools of market and population control to entities driven solely by profit maximization completely aside.
prawnstar89: Don't like the tracking practice? Simple, don't use the product.
Anecdote time - when Steam came around, I was extremely unhappy about the fact that, ultimately, any game I buy through it would be tied to online authentication and subject to expiration whenever that disappears.
I pretty much ended buying no games for 3 years, until it became clear you either accepted Steam as a necessary evil or found a new hobby. Literally no large title released in that time frame ran without Steam - I even bought one boxed game in a store that, without any indication of it on the packaging, only contained Steam installer and Steam game code inside it.
So excuse me if I'm going to continue to voice my objection against something that I see as incredibly damaging to the society in general. I read enough sci-fi dystopian novels (not to mention talked with people who, as an example, did early development work at Google) to know where it's headed. Human nature being what it is, and legal protection of privacy in that respect being next to inexistant. At least outside EU, and even GDPR got ignored by majority of tech companies in general, and game developers in particular. Hell, RedShell got found in games in active use by EU residents weeks after GDPR deadline, and to the best of my knowledge nobody got fined.
prawnstar89: I hate to see some minority (not pointing finger at you) go around campaigning that all tracking developers are "evil" and "wants to steal your identity" because the truth is, they just want to improve their product.
Funny how decades of developers managed to make great games without violating privacy of somebody's computer, much less resorting to installing third-party spyware on them.
You want game analytics data? Ask for it. Accept that some won't consent to it, and move on - you'll get enough people willing to share. For that matter, at least add some legal protection to your ToS for the information you collect to the point where any transfer of it to a third party is strictly illegal. Sure, you can still sell it behind everybody's back, but at least there's a pretense of attention to customer protection.
Hell, I sent enough bug reports and hardware specs to people I tested things for free just because I liked what they were doing. The difference here was that this was MY decision to do so. Also, Google et al had yet to make their billions trading such information, so nobody really saw it as something marketable, unlike the situation nowadays.
This does not happen. Instead, I get an ultimatum - pay for my game, which I may or may not turn into a data-mining tool because "this EULA is subject to future modifications," and fuck your privacy, plebe.
The more you accept that, the fewer games will be there for me to enjoy, until I run into exactly the same situation as happened with Steam distribution being the only way to obtain titles that interested me. Considering gaming has been my main hobby for *cough* decades, as well as a professional focus of mine, I'm not keen on looking for a substitute.
Especially since any benefits gained from such enforcement of ubiquitous data collection are hardly outweighing the damage it does.
prawnstar89: Negative reviews and bad publicity hurts more than what people think, and I am not sure that these developers deserve that.
I think anybody abusing my trust this way absolutely does. RedShell was literal spyware - third-party software used to pull information from people's computers without consent or knowledge.
I'm happy to see any developer who thought that was a right thing to do in the first place to crash and burn, because if they could not bother to consider the implication of that serious of an invasion of privacy, they do not deserve to exist. Leave market room for those that do.
prawnstar89: We could all do with more positive reviews and less negativity in our life, right? :)
It's negativity that changes things for the benefit of everybody. Or at least has the potential to do so, if not misused itself.
Blind acceptance of the status quo never moved the society forward.
Edit: Fixed some misquote derp.