anitmetee: It's weird. GOG clearly gets more games every year, more money, more customers. One could think it would be very logical to hire more real people for support of "the hand that feeds you" and buys the games, to satisfy a customer, to not make 'em go away in disappointment to the service like Steam. I won't even mention the fact GOG's "quality control" has degraded significantly.
I'm not sure about the economics of GOG's operation honestly. I think it probably takes a lot of customers buying a lot of games to make the operation profitable even with a modest number of employees.
For example, I'm probably one of GOG's biggest customers and the income I generate for them is still a small fraction of an employee's yearly salary. Heck, they'd have 1000 customers like me and that still wouldn't cut it.
I'm sure making an operation like GOG's profitable is a non-trivial undertaking that requires plenty of smarts.
However, the two things I'll point out that I know about:
- They seem to have focused A LOT on Galaxy and the support for offline installers has been worse off for it. To me, this indicates that either they no longer care about offline installers or that Galaxy is not a profit-generating product and substracting the expenses it generates to the extra income it generates puts it in the red and takes away from the rest of the platform
- A badly implemented buggy platform will generate a lot more long term maintanance overhead (both in development and customer-facing tech support). I sometimes look at their job offerings (not that I want to leave me job as I'm very happy where I am, but I want to know what tech stack they are using) and I see that php is still the main language for their backend. Sorry if I come off as judgmental, but I think that in 2023, they are unlikely to find a lot of quality talent that will put their platform in a good place if they are hiring php devs. I'm sure there are still highly skilled php devs out there, but on average, I think people still doing php as their main jam haven't kept up with the times and are unlikely to be that invested in their career
However the reason though, the one thing I do know is that my confidence in the platform has been shaken lately.
LegoDnD: A fair point that some have it worse than me, but I guess doing even the slightest hint of computer labor equates to neglecting children now, so the world really is doomed.
I think its complicated. Often, I wish your average end user was more invested in computing, but I also often think that technology professionals should be more invested in your average end user.
I think for some things like security, technology professionals will never be able to solve those problems completely for their users and people will have to get more savvy about that.
At the same time, I think the software industry, at all levels, is highly complex and I believe it is important for technology professionals to be highly empathetic for their end-users and make things as simple for them as they possibly can (which they often don't do).
So I think the mindset that users lashing out against extra complexity are lazy is faulty. I think things should be made as simple as functionally possible for the end-user.