It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
teceem:
Alright, series then. My English is fairly mediocre so easy not to get the words just right. The 2200G is a Zen chip, then came Zen+ and then the Zen2 numered 3500 upwards on desktops.
Post edited December 05, 2019 by Themken
avatar
teceem:
avatar
Themken: Alright, series then. My English is fairly mediocre so easy not to get the words just right. The 2200G is a Zen chip, then came Zen+ and then the Zen2 numered 3500 upwards on desktops.
Oh, I didn't mean that... your English is just fine. It's me... generation just sounds like it should be a little bit closer to the concept of "human generations".
But well, cockroaches have generations too! :-P
(no AMD criticism intended)
Post edited December 05, 2019 by teceem
avatar
teceem:
avatar
Themken: Alright, series then. My English is fairly mediocre so easy not to get the words just right. The 2200G is a Zen chip, then came Zen+ and then the Zen2 numered 3500 upwards on desktops.
I thought the 2000 series Ryzens were Zen+? And 1000 series were Zen, and 3000 series were Zen2?

And I believe all of the Athlons (even the new 3000g) are Zen, not Zen+, or Zen2. Can anyone confirm?
avatar
StationaryNomad: I thought the 2000 series Ryzens were Zen+? And 1000 series were Zen, and 3000 series were Zen2?

And I believe all of the Athlons (even the new 3000g) are Zen, not Zen+, or Zen2. Can anyone confirm?
Isn't there a Wikipedia page explaining it? Does it matter?
avatar
StationaryNomad:
2200G, 2400G and the 2000 mobile series are all first generation = Zen just like the 1000 series. 3200G, 3400G and the 3000 series for mobile are all second generation = Zen+. AMD is lying to less well informed customers with their naming scheme :-(
avatar
StationaryNomad:
avatar
Themken: 2200G, 2400G and the 2000 mobile series are all first generation = Zen just like the 1000 series. 3200G, 3400G and the 3000 series for mobile are all second generation = Zen+. AMD is lying to less well informed customers with their naming scheme :-(
OK, I understand now. Thanks for the explanation.
The best explanation I've seen about this is, every chip with integrated graphics lag a "generation" behind on the Cpu itself.

Wich make next generation mobile freaking great :D
avatar
Themken: AMD is lying to less well informed customers with their naming scheme :-(
Thing is, they are not lying, we just assume how things are. Either way, there are a lot of reasons for AMD to name the current lineup, not that I agree :D
The competitors are currently way weirder in names... Miss the Nvidia 2** to 10** naming scheme... So easy to get.
Post edited December 05, 2019 by Dark_art_
avatar
Dark_art_:
Nvidia and Intel also have misleading naming.
avatar
supplementscene:
avatar
Themken: Six cores, twelve threads Ryzen 3600X. Sure I wanted eight cores but it was expensive as it was already. Also, the 3600X is two generations newer technology than the 2200G.
It's an excellent processor that won't hold you back in gaming

It depends on resolution. Right now you can get an RX 590 from overclockers for £150 - which is a very good deal (an employee stated this deal is expiring very soon). Otherwise a 1660 Super for £200 is a nice step up (but the cooler isn't great).

But for £250 you can get a 5700 for a whole level more of future proofing and performance:

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-radeon-rx-5700-8gb-gddr6-pci-express-graphics-card-asus-65-pounds-cashback-gx-43d-as.html

(this included £65 cashback)
Post edited December 11, 2019 by supplementscene
avatar
supplementscene:
I already bought something new but thank you. Would not order from the UK anyway.
avatar
supplementscene:
avatar
Themken: I already bought something new but thank you. Would not order from the UK anyway.
Ahh well congrats, what did you go for out of curiosity. I'm sure you'll get a nice bump in performance either way.
avatar
supplementscene: Ahh well congrats, what did you go for out of curiosity. I'm sure you'll get a nice bump in performance either way.
Said it here already:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/good_graphics_chip_with_p_poor_cooler/post12

An AMD Radeon RX 580 with 8GB of VRAM. Old technology about to be replaced today.

Not a huge bump in calculation power but certainly in VRAM size.
avatar
supplementscene: Ahh well congrats, what did you go for out of curiosity. I'm sure you'll get a nice bump in performance either way.
avatar
Themken: Said it here already:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/good_graphics_chip_with_p_poor_cooler/post12

An AMD Radeon RX 580 with 8GB of VRAM. Old technology about to be replaced today.

Not a huge bump in calculation power but certainly in VRAM size.
Those are great value cards right now and for 1920x1080 @60Hz that should be perfect for a few years. It's about 50% more performance so you can ramp up settings

The new 5500 XTs that are coming out will cost more but offer about the same performance
Just saw the review of the 5500XT 8 Gigs. Rx480 power consumption with Rx580 performance, same price as a similar performace card released 3 years ago.
Since AMD didn't lower Rx580 prices this was kinda expected...

Glad you didn't wait for the 5500XT, enjoy your card, still very good.
Post edited December 12, 2019 by Dark_art_