Crosmando: The game is still exactly the same as it was when it was released, the only thing that has changed is you. It's not my problem if you're unable to objectively look at games.
TentacleMayor: So the only ones allowed to comment on the quality of games are people who have never seen a game before, thus having no expectations or standards?
No, but it seems you're unable to look at a game and judge it's quality without being influenced by external factors such as what the technology of the time allowed graphics wise.
Your entire argument against this game is basically "culture has changed since the late 90's, so therefore this game is culturally incompatible with the current era, therefore it's bad".
It's like looking at Doom and judging it as bad because of pixellated graphics, completely unable to judge the quality of the artwork within the context of what the computers of the time could handle (the graphics in Doom are actually well done high quality artwork, but obviously are limited by the resolutions of the time).