viperfdl: In your logic an employer could be willing to pay someone, who would be willing to do it for the offered wage, for whipping employees every time they don't work as hard as the employer wants them to and this job would be perfectly valuable.
To the employer, yes. Otherwise he wouldn't be paying anything for an extra whipboy.
Then again, why would the other employees take a job where they get whipped? They should vote with their feet and go to the other jobs where they don't get whipped, or get whipped less regularly. Unless they enjoy getting whipped, of course. Then they should be actually paying the employer for the extra whipping service.
Also, if those employees are robots, I feel there wouldn't even be any moral dilemma to whip them, if it makes them work faster. Who hasn't slapped his PC once in awhile because it didn't work right?
Overall, I dislike the division to "employers" and "employees", because in my mind anyone can be an employer if they wish. Haven't you washed your dishes yet, or cleaned your room? Maybe you should employ a cleaning (wo)man who visits your home every day to do the dishes and vacuum cleaning, and you pay them 5000€/month for the service, because anything less would be exploitation.
What did you say, you do your dishes and cleaning yourself, not employing anyone? You might even use automated robots like a dish washing machine or a robot vacuum cleaner so that you don't have to do it yourself? How awful of you, you capitalistic peeeg! You could have employed one or more people to do all that cleaning stuff at your home, but no you didn't, so now they are unemployed.
See how this works? Employers get accused of trying to get people to do certain tasks cheaply or even use automated robots to do it without human labor, but common people don't get accused when doing exactly the same. Trying to get cheap labor force is no different than buying gas from the gas station that sells it the cheapest. We are all cheapskates, trying to save up in our own expenses.
morolf: Wasn't there something about Trump re-introducing slavery? Or did I just imagine that?
Yes.